site banner
Reported by:

:marseyking:

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Being monarchist is the most cucked thing a person can do, "yes of course he should rule over me, after all he got lucky and was born in the royal family".

  • 4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He is the most trained for the job though. Same reason why you wouldnt allow a coal shoveler to be a pilot, you shouldnt allow someone who won a high school popularity contest assume power

  • 5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The majority of monarchs throughout history are mediocre at best... The best system would be one where each time the ruler dies warlords would fight for the lifetime dictator position, that way a capable leaders can be always in power. Either that or anarchy, no cucked in between.

  • 3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The best system would be one where each time the ruler dies warlords would fight for the lifetime dictator position, that way a capable leaders can be always in power.

well that's how it is in central africa and somehow it doesn't work, huh

  • 5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The average central african man lives a happier life than the average western man… He is truly free while you wageslave to retire at 60 years old.

Which way western man??

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The average central african man lives a happier life than the average western man…

i've heard of an interesting statistic regarding the correlation of a person's iq and their happiness...

if happiness is the only metric, let's just lobotomize everyone

  • 3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats untrue. Yeah there have been shitty monarchs but most were decent or good, certainly a lot better then modern prime ministers and presidents.

A monarch is good at unifying a nation, its one of the reasons norway had such a large ressistance in WW2.

  • 3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Brooo norway got handed a big fat L during ww2

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You sure? We destroyed a ship that cost 5x as much as we spent on defense each year. We lasted longer then france and the ressistance was a huge pain for the germans.

Not to mention all those ships we loaned to you.

  • 3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes but you still lost big time and got occupied. Sounds like a L for me :marseylaugh:

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Without norway you wouldnt have gotten thousands of merchant ships, thousands of willing SOE members, Tirpitz and Bismarks location would have been unknown, the blucher would still exist, you wouldnt have gotten pilots to fight in the RAF, you wouldnt have gotten the naval enigma codes from Måløy. You would have had an extra 600k enemy troops on the western or eastern front.

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tldr

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Based Ted once again !

  • 3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@Ted_Kaczynski's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 4.

Pills:

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

feel like shit, just want Mercia back

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The ideal is a theocracy.

  • 2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Monarchy is cringe indeed

  • 1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cringe

  • 5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree

  • 4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Snapshots:

  • 1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.